I'm a 5th year PhD candidate in political science, and I have finally—FINALLY—figured out a plan and structure that works for me. I've tried three different approaches and watched them all fail. This is the one that's actually working. Maybe it'll help you.
The Overall Timeline (12 months):
Months 1-2: The "Dump" Phase
Write anything and everything related to each chapter. Don't organize. Don't edit. Just get words on the page. I call this "throwing clay on the wheel." You can't shape nothing.
Months 3-5: The "Shape" Phase
Now you have raw material. Start organizing. Move sections around. Create a real outline for each chapter. Identify gaps. This is where you actually build the structure.
Months 6-9: The "Fill" Phase
Write the missing pieces. Deepen analysis. Add sources. Make arguments clearer. This is the real writing work.
Months 10-11: The "Polish" Phase
Line edits. Citation checks. Formatting. Read aloud. Send to advisors.
Month 12: Defend and cry.
The Chapter Structure That Works:
Anyone else have a structure that works?
The Overall Timeline (12 months):
Months 1-2: The "Dump" Phase
Write anything and everything related to each chapter. Don't organize. Don't edit. Just get words on the page. I call this "throwing clay on the wheel." You can't shape nothing.
Months 3-5: The "Shape" Phase
Now you have raw material. Start organizing. Move sections around. Create a real outline for each chapter. Identify gaps. This is where you actually build the structure.
Months 6-9: The "Fill" Phase
Write the missing pieces. Deepen analysis. Add sources. Make arguments clearer. This is the real writing work.
Months 10-11: The "Polish" Phase
Line edits. Citation checks. Formatting. Read aloud. Send to advisors.
Month 12: Defend and cry.
The Chapter Structure That Works:
- Chapter 1: Introduction. The problem, the question, the argument, the roadmap. Write this last.
- Chapter 2: Literature Review. Not just summary. A conversation. Identify the gap YOUR work fills.
- Chapter 3: Methodology. How you did it. Why it's legit.
- Chapter 4-5: Findings/Results. Just the facts. No interpretation yet.
- Chapter 6: Discussion. Now interpret. What does it mean? Why should anyone care?
- Chapter 7: Conclusion. Summary, limitations, future research, implications.
Anyone else have a structure that works?